The Internet Language of Uzbekistan: Between Tradition and Innovation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51699/cajlpc.v7i1.1415Keywords:
Internet Discourse, Uzbek Language, Code-Switching, Multimodality, Visual Communication, Emojis, PunctuationAbstract
The article analyses the characteristics of internet discourse in Uzbekistan in the context of digital transformation. Uzbek internet language is considered a hybrid system combining traditional linguistic norms and innovative digital practices. Particular attention is paid to the phenomena of code-switching, multimodality, and visualisation of communication. Using material from social networks (Instagram, Telegram, YouTube), the article shows how language mixing, the use of emojis, and graphic symbols change the structure of written speech and reflect the socio-cultural processes of modern Uzbekistan. In the context of rapid digital development, language is taking on new forms that reflect transformations in public consciousness and communication. Uzbekistan, located at the crossroads of cultures and languages, demonstrates a unique model of Internet language evolution, in which traditional norms and innovative trends collide. Internet discourse is shaped by multilingualism, youth subculture and cross-border communication, leading to the emergence of hybrid lexical and syntactic constructions. A distinctive feature of Internet communication in Uzbekistan is the parallel use of Uzbek, Russian and English, as well as the active introduction of the Latin and Cyrillic alphabets in a single text stream. According to research by the Institute of Language and Literature of the Academy of Sciences of Uzbekistan (2022), more than 60% of social media users regularly mix languages in a single message, creating the phenomenon of code-switching, which is becoming common practice in online communication.
References
B. Danet and S. C. Herring, The Multilingual Internet: Language, Culture, and Communication Online. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2007.
S. C. Herring, “Web content analysis,” in The SAGE Handbook of Online Research Methods, N. Fielding, R. M. Lee and G. Blank, Eds. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2008, pp. 230–249.
D. Crystal, Language and the Internet, 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
M. Androutsopoulos, “Code-switching in computer-mediated communication,” Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 41, no. 9, pp. 1909–1936, 2009.
C. Tagg, Exploring Digital Communication: Language in Action. London, UK: Routledge, 2015.
Y. Tsvetkov et al., “Metaphor detection with interpretable neural networks,” Computational Linguistics, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 269–301, 2018.
G. Kress, Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. London, UK: Routledge, 2010.
V. D’Andrea and F. Ferri, “Emoji and communication: understanding pictographic grammar in digital discourse,” Future Internet, vol. 11, no. 10, p. 226, 2019.
T. McCulloch and M. W. Scheffler, “Punctuation in digital writing: shifts, functions and innovations,” Written Communication, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 549–575, 2019.
A. Pavalanathan and J. Eisenstein, “Emoticons vs emojis on Twitter: lexical evolution in online writing,” in Proc. AAAI ICWSM, 2016, pp. 518–523.
Rabbimov I. et al., “Investigating the effect of emoji in opinion classification of uzbek movie review comments,” in International Conference on Speech and Computer. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020, pp. 435–445.
Cohn, N., Engelen, J. and Schilperoord, J., “The grammar of emoji? Constraints on communicative pictorial sequencing,” Cognitive Research, vol. 4, p. 33, 2019.
Ministry of Digital Technologies of the Republic of Uzbekistan, “Official Telegram channel.” Accessed: Dec. 10, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://t.me/mitcuz
Xushnudbek, “Personal Telegram channel: news and commentary.” Accessed: Dec. 10, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://t.me/xushnudbek
Digital 2025: Узбекистан — DataReportal – Global Digital Insights.


