Phraseological Units in Folk Epics Methodological Description
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51699/cajlpc.v7i1.1416Keywords:
Phraseology, Phraseological Unit, Phraseological Methodology, Emotionality, Expressiveness, Stylistically Characterized and Uncharacterized PhraseologyAbstract
Despite the fact that phraseological units serve both the linguistic expressiveness and the active representation of national culture and at the same time their methodological description is still poorly implemented in global and Uzbek linguistics. There are studies of both functional and stylistic features of phraseologisms in Uzbek linguistics, but still there is no methodological classification and analysis of phraseologisms in folk epic genres of Uzbek linguistics. The current focus of studies around isolated examples or artistic texts has evidenced the absence of continued principled systematic description at the world level of analysis, rendering unresolved semantic-pragmatic relation issues, stylistic variability, and connotation processes. The purpose of this study is to examine the methodological features of phraseological units in folk epics, based on the criteria of emotionality, expressiveness, figurativeness and structural complexity, to recommend their classification. It has been established that phraseological units have two meanings, expressive-evaluative and functional-stylistic; the structure of phraseological units is dominated by emotionality and expressiveness. The explicit specificity of means is specified in the connotation, relations between components, and stylistic coloring of the theoretical analysis of these means. The paper presents a systematic definition of methodological description, and highlights the anthropocentric and semantic-pragmatic dimensions of the field, while also questioning the traditional dependence on component analysis, by bringing in the connotative stylistic criterion. Formalising principles of classifying and interpreting phraseological units in Uzbek folk epics these insights provide important contributions to lexicographic and phraseographic practices, enriches development of linguistic theory, and is of relevance to educational applications.
References
B. Yoldoshev, Functional–Methodological Features of Phraseological Units in Modern Uzbek Literary Language, Doctoral dissertation, Tashkent, 2010.
Shmelev, D. I. Lexical Semantics of the Modern Russian Language. Moscow: Nauka, 1973.
Kunin, A. V. Course in Phraseology of the Modern English Language. Moscow: Vysshaya Shkola, 1996.
Amosova, N. N. Essays on English Phraseology. Leningrad: Leningrad University Press, 1963.
Vinogradov, V. V. Lexicology and Lexicography. Moscow: Nauka, 1972.
Abduazizov, A. A. Semantic and Phraseological Studies in Uzbek Linguistics. Tashkent: Fan, 2005.
Mamatov, A. Phraseological Units in Uzbek Folk Epics. Samarkand: SamDU Press, 2018.
Cowie, A. P. Phraseology: Theory, Analysis and Applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.
Dobrovol’skij, D., & Piirainen, E. Figurative Language: Cross-Cultural and Cross-Linguistic Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2005.
Moon, R. Fixed Expressions and Idioms in English: A Corpus-Based Approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998.
Gläser, R. “The Stylistic Potential of Phraseological Units in Texts.” Phraseology: Theory and Practice, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1986.
Wray, A. Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.
Hüning, M., & Schlücker, B. “Multi-word Expressions and Phraseology in Linguistic Theory.” Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, vol. 6, 2008, pp. 239–260.
Zykova, I. V. Phraseology as a Linguistic Discipline. Moscow: FLINTA, 2011.


