Functional-Cognitive Nature of Forms of Address
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51699/cajlpc.v7i2.1495Keywords:
Form of Address, Vocativity, Connotation, Cognitive Pragmatics, Illocutionary Force, Perlocutionary Result, Socio-RegulativityAbstract
This article analyzes the multifunctional nature of forms of address on the basis of N. V. Bugakova’s cognitive-pragmatic approach. The pragmatic, phatic, vocative, socio-regulatory, etiquette, identificational, evaluative, influential, performative, illocutionary, and perlocutionary functions of address units are explained with examples. As a result of the analysis, it is substantiated that a form of address is not merely a means of naming the addressee, but a functional-semantic unit that conceptualizes the addressee in social, emotional, and axiological terms.
References
G. Lakoff and M. Johnson, Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press, 1980.
N. V. Bugakova, “Kategoriya obrashcheniya v svete kognitivnoy lingvistiki (na materiale frantsuzskogo yazyka),” Ph.D. dissertation, Voronezh, Russia, 2001.
E. S. Kubryakova, V. Z. Demyankov, Yu. G. Pankrats, and L. G. Luzina, Kratkiy slovar’ kognitivnykh terminov. Moscow, Russia, 1996.
M. Qodirova, “Turli tizimli tillarda murojaatning kommunikativ-pragmatik aspekti (ingliz va o‘zbek tillari materiallari asosida),” Ph.D. dissertation abstract, Termiz, Uzbekistan, 2021.
N. I. Formanovskaya, Russkiy rechevoy etiket: lingvisticheskiy i metodicheskiy aspekty. Moscow, Russia, 1982.
M. G. Barakova, “Lingvisticheskaya priroda i pragmakognitivnye funktsii obrashcheniya,” Ph.D. dissertation, Moscow, Russia, 2005.
V. E. Goldin, Obrashchenie: teoreticheskie problemy. Saratov, Russia, 1987.
M. A. Olikova, Obrashchenie v sovremennom angliyskom yazyke. Lvov, Ukraine, 1979.
M. V. Nikitin, “O strukture leksicheskogo znacheniya,” in Voprosy struktury angliyskogo yazyka v sinkhronii i diakhronii, vol. 5, Leningrad, Russia, 1985, pp. 116–125.
V. I. Karasik, Yazykovoy krug: lichnost’, kontsepty, diskurs. Volgograd, Russia, 2002.
D. Wunderlich, “Methodological remarks on speech act theory,” in Speech Acts Theory and Pragmatics. Dordrecht, Netherlands, 1980, pp. 291–312.
L. P. Ryzhova, “Kommunikativnye osobennosti obrashcheniya,” in Soderzhatel’nye aspekty predlozheniya i teksta. Kalinin, Russia, 1983, pp. 1–152.
A. M. Kuznetsov, “O primenenii metoda komponentnogo analiza v leksike,” in Sinkhronno-sopostavitel’nyy analiz yazykov raznykh sistem. Moscow, Russia, 2000, pp. 233–234.
V. G. Gak, “K probleme semanticheskoy sintagmatiki,” in Problemy strukturnoy lingvistiki, Moscow, Russia, 1972, pp. 369–383.
Z. Kövecses and G. Radden, “Metonymy: Developing a cognitive linguistic view,” Cognitive Linguistics, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 37–77, 1998.
