Heuristic Possibilities and Methodological Significance of The Civilization Approach in The Research of Social Development

Hakimov Akmaljon Mirzaganievich

doi:10.51699/cajlpc.v7i2.1527

Authors

Hakimov Akmaljon Mirzaganievich Kokand State University, Senior lecturer of the Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51699/cajlpc.v7i2.1527

Keywords:

Civilizational Approach, Civilization, Social Development, Social Philosophy, Heuristic Possibilities, Epistemological Analysis

Abstract

This article examines the heuristic possibilities of the civilizational approach as a methodology for studying social development. The study focuses on the diversity of civilizational models and explains different interpretations of civilization allow researchers to analyze social systems from various theoretical perspectives. The article argues that the civilizational approach helps move beyond a one dimensional and Eurocentric understanding of history by recognizing the uniqueness of different regions, peoples and cultures. It concludes that civilizational models provide a reliable methodological basis for assessing social progress, modern civilization and future development.

References

N. Ya. Danilevskiy, Rossiya i Evropa, S. A. Vagaychev (ed.). Moscow: Kniga, 1991, p. 163.

O. Spengler, Zakat Evropy: v 2 t. T. 1. Obraz i deystvitelnost, I. I. Makhan’kov (trans.). Moscow: Ayris-Press, 2003.

A. Toynbee, Postizhenie istorii, E. D. Zharkov (trans.), 2nd ed. Moscow: Ayris-Press, 2002, p. 214.

P. Sorokin, Sotsiologicheskie istorii sovremennosti. Moscow: Inion, 1992.

N. Elias, O protsesse tsivilizatsii: Sotsiogeneticheskie i psikhogeneticheskie issledovaniya. Moscow: Universitetskaya kniga, 2001, p. 122.

Sh. Eisenstadt, Revolyutsiya i preobrazovanie obshchestv: sravnitelnoe izuchenie tsivilizatsiy. Moscow: Aspekt Press, 1999.

N. Ya. Danilevskiy, Rossiya i Evropa, op. cit., pp. 115–116.

N. Ya. Danilevskiy, Rossiya i Evropa, op. cit., p. 116.

N. Ya. Danilevskiy, Rossiya i Evropa, op. cit., p. 117.

N. Ya. Danilevskiy, Rossiya i Evropa, op. cit., pp. 115–117.

I. N. Ionov, “Teoriya tsivilizatsiy na rubezhe XXI veka,” Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost, no. 2, p. 23, 1992.

L. N. Gumilev, Etnogenez i biosfera Zemli, A. I. Kurkchi (ed.). Moscow: Institut DI-DIK, 1997.

L. N. Gumilev, Konets i vnov nachalo. Moscow: Tanais, 1994, p. 42.

I. M. Savelyeva and A. V. Poletaev, Istoriya i vremya: v poiskakh utrachennogo. Moscow: Yazyki russkoy kultury, 1997, p. 349.

T. B. Sobirovich, “Basic Criteria for Building the Third Renaissance in Uzbekistan,” Asian Journal of Applied Science and Technology, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 149–157, 2023.

B. Turdiyev, “Manifestations of Moral Threats in the Ideosphere of Uzbekistan and Their Prevention Strategy,” Asian Journal of Basic Science & Research.